Re: [dxwg] From SHACL: profiles based on same ontology (#800)

@aisaac - I like your way of expressing this and acknowledge that we could inject some wording to make this more explicit. I am surprised its neccesary - because its kind of obvious and is what happens everywhere we have a description of a thing, in that the things themselves need to be examined to discover relationships not explicitly described in the descriptions.  But the evidence is there that it needs to be stated.  This also needs to be in the guidance doc - so if you wanted to inject a clause there we could quote it in the explanation of the profiles vocabulary and usage notes.
(elsewhere you made the good point that the vocabulary should focus on just describing the model not how it is to be used in all cases)


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by rob-metalinkage
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/800#issuecomment-525071356 using your GitHub account

Received on Monday, 26 August 2019 23:25:03 UTC