- From: Stephen Richard via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2019 19:35:40 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Seems like this issue depends first on the resolution of #643, where the question (as I read it) is 'is the prof:profileOfTransitive property necessary'. A lot of the discussion here is more germane to #643. If the answer to that is NO, then this issue is moot. If the answer is yes, then the original questions here are: 1. should 'profileOfTransitive' be renamed 'transitiveProfileOf' 2. should two assertions be added to the ontology: ` prof:profileOfTransitive rdf:type owl:ObjectProperty , owl:TransitiveProperty . prof:profileOf rdfs:subPropertyOf prof:profileOfTransitive .` It looks like there are 4 upvotes on this proposal (https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/486#issuecomment-434123157, and following comment from @nicholascar). FWIW I'm +1 on the proposed changes on as well. -- GitHub Notification of comment by smrgeoinfo Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/486#issuecomment-524436884 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 23 August 2019 19:35:42 UTC