Re: [dxwg] Related vocabularies mapping [RVM]

Including the comment from [an email by Guillaume Duffes](https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dxwg-comments/2018Sep/0000.html):

```
- Define guidelines how to create a DCAT description of a VOID or Data Cube dataset<https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/88>:
    ** We agree with the fact that this "DCAT using QB" should be harmonised with VOID and clarified. It is crucial for the official statistics community to use the proper semantics and relationship between these vocabularies..
    ** In our mind, qb:DataStructureDefinition and qd:Slice are meant to express subsets (see also #161<https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/161>) like "startups in Italy". A similar use case is provided in the RDF Data Cube Recommendation.
```


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by agbeltran
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/88#issuecomment-420898806 using your GitHub account

Received on Thursday, 13 September 2018 06:31:57 UTC