W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > September 2018

Re: CNEG subgroup - proposing Use Case (Issue 239) to Plenary

From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2018 09:32:18 -0700
To: "Car, Nicholas (L&W, Dutton Park)" <Nicholas.Car@csiro.au>, "Peter.Winstanley@gov.scot" <Peter.Winstanley@gov.scot>
Cc: Dataset Exchange Working Group <public-dxwg-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <13aea5e0-8820-5bb3-169d-cc8ff1bea18a@kcoyle.net>
I've added it to the agenda. It's the first use case in the list of open
use cases.

kc

On 9/1/18 1:50 AM, Car, Nicholas (L&W, Dutton Park) wrote:
> With 3 x +1, 1 x 0 and 0 x -1 out of a possible 6 voters (the regular
> attendees of CNEG meetings), this is carried.
> 
> Karen or Peter: please could you indicate in the agenda for the next
> plenary meeting that this Use Case is supported by the CNEG group who
> asks Plenary to endorse it?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Nick
> 
> *Nicholas Car*
> 
> /Senior Experimental Scientist/
> 
> CSIRO Land & Water
> 
> E nicholas.car@csiro.au <mailto:nicholas.car@csiro.au> M 0477 560 177
> <tel:0477%20560%20177> P 07 3833 5632
> 
> Dutton Park, QLD, Australia
> 
> 
> On 1 Sep 2018, at 4:43 pm, Rob Atkinson <robatkinson101@gmail.com
> <mailto:robatkinson101@gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
>> +1
>>
>> Fine to add requirement for human readable annotations as well as
>> follow-your-nose links to alternatives.
>>
>>
>> On Sat, 1 Sep 2018, 10:53 Car, Nicholas (L&W, Dutton Park)
>> <Nicholas.Car@csiro.au <mailto:Nicholas.Car@csiro.au>> wrote:
>>
>>     The purpose of bringing this Use Case through is to then generate
>>     a requirement, as per the general pattern of UC -> Req -> Req
>>     Response.
>>
>>     On 1/9/18, 2:49 am, "Karen Coyle" <kcoyle@kcoyle.net
>>     <mailto:kcoyle@kcoyle.net>> wrote:
>>
>>         A basic requirement for human readable documentation appears
>>     in the use
>>         case but isn't in the list of requirements. If the group
>>     agrees, that
>>         can be added as a requirement. (It generally seems like a good
>>     idea,
>>         right?)
>>
>>         kc
>>
>>         On 8/31/18 8:16 AM, Robert Sanderson wrote:
>>         > I remain +0 for the protocol negotiation part via URL
>>     munging, and an
>>         > enthusiastic +1 for the requirement for human readable
>>     documentation.
>>         >
>>         >
>>         >
>>         > On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 10:26 PM Car, Nicholas (L&W, Dutton
>>     Park)
>>         > <Nicholas.Car@csiro.au <mailto:Nicholas.Car@csiro.au>> wrote:
>>         >
>>         >     Dear DWGX Conneg Subgroup,
>>         >
>>         >     This email may appear twice due to a send issue at my
>>     end. Please
>>         >     take this copy to be the bet one.
>>         >
>>         >     We have a left-over action from our last meeting to consider
>>         >     promoting the Use Case “Web browser navigation of profile
>>         >     information” (https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/239) to
>>     the Plenary
>>         >     group for voting on.
>>         >
>>         >     Please could Conneg subgroup members reply to this with
>>     either +1, 0
>>         >     or -1 to indicate if this Use Case should be sent to
>>     Plenary? Votes
>>         >     should be in before the Plenary on 2018-09-04 in order
>>     for it to be
>>         >     considered there.
>>         >
>>         >     Thanks,
>>         >
>>         >     Nick
>>         >
>>         >
>>         >
>>         > --
>>         > Rob Sanderson
>>         > Semantic Architect
>>         > The Getty Trust
>>         > Los Angeles, CA 90049
>>
>>         --
>>         Karen Coyle
>>         kcoyle@kcoyle.net <mailto:kcoyle@kcoyle.net> http://kcoyle.net
>>         m: 1-510-435-8234 (Signal)
>>         skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600
>>
>>
>>

-- 
Karen Coyle
kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net
m: 1-510-435-8234 (Signal)
skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600
Received on Saturday, 1 September 2018 16:32:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 April 2019 13:45:01 UTC