- From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 19:10:13 +0000
- To: "public-dxwg-wg@w3.org" <public-dxwg-wg@w3.org>
This is just a quick update coming out of the F2F - everyone should take a quick look at the minutes because there was quite a bit of interesting discussion. There are also a number of action items which you will view in the October 30 plenary. https://www.w3.org/2018/10/25-dxwg-minutes https://www.w3.org/2018/10/26-dxwg-minutes We accepted three of the missing requirements for the content negotiation document. These are at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/290 https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/289 https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/265 We decide to publish the profiles ontology as a first public working draft. We resolved keep the vocabulary alignments (e.g. DCAT <-> schema.org) out of the normative document and provide a link to their location. However, we then had a discussion where we seem to have agreed to leave the schema.org alignment in the document to provide an example, in spite of the downside of having the alignment in a published document. (Downside mainly relates to the difficulty of updating because published documents cannot be modified.) We decided to modify the "DXWG Family" section in the documents: only the group of profile documents should appear in each of the profile-related documents; the DCAT document will remove the family of documents section. -- Karen Coyle kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net m: 1-510-435-8234 (Signal) skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600
Received on Monday, 29 October 2018 19:10:43 UTC