- From: Riccardo Albertoni via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2018 15:02:28 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
I agree with Makx's remark > it is essential to consider the definition of a term in a particular context and not what someone would think that a term means. and I strongly believe that users must read definitions and shouldn't solely rely on the class name. However, I have also had the impression the dcat:resource is a quite confusing name. As a matter of fact, in the document, the paragraph related to dcat:Resource is titled as ["Catalogued Resource"](https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/dcat/#Class:Resource) I suspect we'd better use dcat:CataloguedResource instead of just dcat:Resource. That would clarify that the class indicates anything which can be catalogued and not any kind of thing as in the case of rdfs:Resource. @agreiner Would this make a little bit clearer what we mean with resource in DCAT? At least it would explain why dcat:CataloguedResource does't include dcat:Distribution as subclass? -- GitHub Notification of comment by riccardoAlbertoni Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/431#issuecomment-428228073 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 9 October 2018 15:02:36 UTC