- From: Dan Brickley via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2018 16:27:34 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
fwiw the definition of foaf: Document clearly covers datasets. Services in the abstract are less plausible, although maybe their homepages, REST endpoints etc? On Wed, 3 Oct 2018, 07:32 Alejandra Gonzalez-Beltran, < notifications@github.com> wrote: > +1, and I think it would apply to dcat:Dataset too, as it shouldn't be > inferred as a foaf:Document IMO (just a note that the directionality is > dcat:CatalogRecord -- foaf:primaryTopic---> dcat:Resource) > > — > You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/438#issuecomment-426659958>, or mute > the thread > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAKZGeOQr2jxPhZ0yqXVGqpt4ETT7k-Dks5uhMqMgaJpZM4XGJhJ> > . > -- GitHub Notification of comment by danbri Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/438#issuecomment-426703275 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 3 October 2018 16:27:36 UTC