- From: Stephen Richard via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 22:43:53 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
How about ID21? From: Rob Atkinson <notifications@github.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2018 3:43 PM To: w3c/dxwg <dxwg@noreply.github.com> Cc: Stephen Richard <smrTucson@gmail.com>; Mention <mention@noreply.github.com> Subject: Re: [w3c/dxwg] A profile may be (partially) "implemented" by "schemas" (in OWL, SHACL, XML Schema...) that allow different levels of data validation [ID37] (5.37) (#273) @smrgeoinfo <https://github.com/smrgeoinfo> the issue of validation is no different for any other declarative statement. The semantics of conformsTo is that all constraints are met and all normative validation tests pass. People can still lie, or configure machines to do it for them by accident... at this stage there is no "a little bit like" or "partially conformsTo" mechanism - "aspiresTo" ? We lack a motivating Use Case for explicit DQ statements about conformance evidence. — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/273#issuecomment-440455624> , or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAfVZF3YXshLqer4OA_VQqjNN7M490IOks5uxIVxgaJpZM4U5A9v> . -- GitHub Notification of comment by smrgeoinfo Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/273#issuecomment-440455858 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 20 November 2018 22:43:54 UTC