Re: [dxwg] Jaroslav's profiles ont doc edits

Addressing the points above by number with changes initially in the [ont-fpwd-edits](https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/tree/ont-fpwd-edits) branch:

1. You're going to have to make a concrete suggestion as just saying it is opaque or abstract doesn't really help us! We obviously thought what we wrote was ok and would be prepared to change what we wrote but would need an indication of something better to work with.

2. The target really is information standards. Use of this ontology isn't limited to digital contexts. Sure, using the ontology itself is likely to be a digital task but it could describe non-digital profiles (think: printed profile Guidance Resource Descriptors).

I have introduced a one-liner in the Introduction that indicates the definition of `Profile` to be used is that of the class definition in the Specification. Commit https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/commit/b1dbea2e48b77b97fab32c91d1b7247969542c49

3. We have had a couple of questions about this! Note that `Base Specification` `isProfileOf` with a cardinality of zero indicating that `Base Specifications` are `Profiles`, and thus `dct:Standards` that do no profile anything else. I have improved this in the diagram by indicating that the `Base Specification` `isProfileOf` zero to the `dct:Standard`, not `Profile`. Commit https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/commit/b12d83583e5ffc0b310b622722bc9adf6d27ce22


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by nicholascar
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/570#issuecomment-438853660 using your GitHub account

Received on Wednesday, 14 November 2018 23:09:54 UTC