Re: ACTION on ALL - FPWDs

That's true and we are close (my counts below) but it's not fatal if we change even the namespaces later.

It appears that /TR/prof-guidance, /TR/prof-conneg /TR/ prof are the preferred set of 3 short codes for the documents and that /ns/prof/ is preferred for the namespace of the Profiles Ontology so we can go ahead with those for FPWD. 

There is still disagreement about the need for a separate, or derivative, namespace for the vocab of profile Resource Roles and no reference to this vocab or namespace is currently present in the Profiles Ontology document but an Issue for sorting this out is present. So we can't ask for anything for Roles yet but this shouldn't prevent other things going ahead.

Nick


So far we have:

PROF guidance spec:
https://www.w3.org/TR/prof-guide

+0 AI - Antoine

https://www.w3.org/TR/prof-guidance

+1 AI
+1 KC
+1 NC

PROF CONNEG spec:
https://www.w3.org/TR/prof-conneg

+1 AI
+1 NC
+1 LS 
+1 NC

PROF voc spec:
https://www.w3.org/TR/prof

+1 AP
+1 NC
+1 AI
+1 RA 


PROF namespace:
http(s)://www.w3.org/ns/prof/
+1 AP
+1 AI
+1 NC

http(s)://www.w3.org/ns/dx/prof/
0


PROF Roles
http(s)://www.w3.org/ns/prof/role/ - original proposal
+1 RA
+0 NC

http(s)://www.w3.org/ns/prof-roles/ - a ‘dash’ namespace, not a sub-namespace like /prov/role/
+0 NC
-1 AI - does not approve of a separate namespace
+1 AP




On 12/11/18, 6:51 am, "Alejandra Gonzalez-Beltran" <alejandra.gonzalezbeltran@oerc.ox.ac.uk> wrote:

    I imagine that the namespaces need to be resolved before publication of 
    the PWDs?
    
    Thanks,
    
    Alejandra
    
    On 11/11/2018 15:34, Karen Coyle wrote:
    > All,
    >
    > We have two documents that are ready to be issued as First Public
    > Working Drafts,[1] [2]  and we want to promote them to this at the
    > meeting on November 13.[3] The ACTION on everyone is to READ these
    > documents and let us know IMMEDIATELY if you see a serious problem that
    > would keep either of these from being published. Remember that a FPWD is
    > a DRAFT and that anything can change in future drafts. The purpose of
    > the draft is to solicit comments from the community on the direction of
    > the work.
    >
    > You can also comment on the content of the drafts where you see the need
    > for modifications to future drafts, and we will create github issues and
    > discuss these, but these comments will not delay the FPWD.
    >
    > We will take a consensus vote on these at the meeting. If you are
    > sending regrets, please also let us know how you would vote on these drafts:
    >
    > +1 issue as FPWD
    > 0 abstain (but don't object)
    > -1 object (and give your reason in enough detail that it can be addressed)
    >
    > kc
    > [1] https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/conneg-by-ap/

    > [2] https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/profilesont/

    > [3] https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2018.11.13

Received on Monday, 12 November 2018 06:21:46 UTC