Re: [dxwg] property profileOfTransitive

@kcoyle in https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/486#issuecomment-435887068. Yes, indeed, there's potentially many complex things that could be modeled but, like original DCAT, let's get this fairly simple model out there and leave complexity to PROFv2! Profile relation typologies, fine-grained ResourceDescriptor/Profile relations etc. all interesting and difficult but I don't fancy an ontology with many more classes and relations than we have now. 

Currently there is no way in ontology land to formally define a profile and its bits, at any level of detail, so this is an improvement, and even if more finessing may be desired, I would hope simplicity will see wider adoption.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by nicholascar
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/486#issuecomment-436233760 using your GitHub account

Received on Tuesday, 6 November 2018 12:20:37 UTC