- From: Rob Atkinson via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 23 May 2018 21:55:35 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
The proposed ISO wording also hinges on the definitions of "document", "recognized", "body" etc. too. Can a "community of 1 person today, and some unknown number of future collaborators opting in" define a "standard" in the scope of their own activities. They can look in the mirror and recognise themselves :-) . All it implies is if they publish something there is a "reference point" as per the original scope. That said, it feels certain to derail the expectations of some people reading it. -- GitHub Notification of comment by rob-metalinkage Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/214#issuecomment-391509100 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 23 May 2018 21:55:38 UTC