- From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- Date: Thu, 3 May 2018 12:28:44 -0700
- To: Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>
- Cc: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Sure. That way we can think about this some more. - kc On 5/3/18 8:45 AM, Dave Raggett wrote: > I took a look and wasn’t convinced about what I saw on the > web.archive.org <http://web.archive.org> site. I would prefer to drop > the links and add them back when we publish an update to the initial > Working Draft. This would allow the Webmaster to go ahead with the > release of the FPWD on Tuesday. Is that acceptable? > > Many thanks, > > Dave > >> On 3 May 2018, at 17:11, Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net >> <mailto:kcoyle@kcoyle.net>> wrote: >> >> If some URLs are included for historical purposes, perhaps we can use >> the archive.org <http://archive.org> copy as the URL. I've placed >> those below >> >> On 5/3/18 2:35 AM, Dave Raggett wrote: >>> I am preparing the editor’s draft for release as a First Public Working >>> Draft. Unfortunately, there are a number of problems with broken links. >>> >>> The first problem is the URL for the interval data set from >>> data.gov.uk <http://data.gov.uk> >>> <http://data.gov.uk> now returns 404 not found! >>> >>> http://reference.data.gov.uk/id/interval >> >> https://web.archive.org/web/*/http://reference.data.gov.uk/id/interval >> >>> >>> What URL should we use in its place? >>> >>> The link checker was unable to connect to both of the following: >>> >>> http://www.deri.ie/ >> >> https://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.deri.ie/ >> >>> http://vocab.deri.ie/dcat >> >> https://web.archive.org/web/*/http://vocab.deri.ie/dcat >> >>> >>> DERI is now the Insight Centre, so what should we do with these links? >>> >>> The first occurs in reference to Fadi Maali as a previous editor, and >>> the next occurs in reference to the original DCAT vocabulary, that was >>> developed at the Digital Enterprise Research Institute (DERI). >>> >>> There are also a large number of links with broken fragment identifiers. >>> Here are some examples: >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/ns/dcat#dataset >>> http://www.w3.org/ns/dcat#record >>> >>> These reflect a weakness with the link checker in that it checks the >>> default resource returned for this URL which is an HTML document with >>> links to the ontology in Turtle and RDF/XML. >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#Class >>> http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#Literal >>> >>> Here the link checker gets the Turtle version of the URL, but doesn’t >>> know how to process this format. >>> >>> I will ask the W3C Webmaster about these and will make the case that the >>> link checker isn’t adequate for such links. >>> >>> / /#Class:_Catalog >>> / /#Class:_Dataset >>> / /#example-landing-page >>> / /#Class:_Distribution >>> / /#Class:_Organization.2FPerson >>> / /#Class:_Catalog_record >>> / >>> / >>> These are broken links within the editor’s draft where we are missing >>> the corresponding id attributes as the target for these links. Note >>> the “2F” in the penultimate reference, which looks like it is missing a >>> preceding “%”. >>> >>> Any ideas for how to fix these? >>> >>> p.s. we also need to change the latest public version link in the >>> editor’s draft to: >>> >>> https://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-dcat-2/ >>> >>> This is respect to the version tracking system now in place for W3C >>> reports, see: >>> >>> https://www.w3.org/2005/05/tr-versions >>> >>> Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org <mailto:dsr@w3.org>> >>> http://www.w3.org/People/Raggett >>> W3C Data Activity Lead & W3C champion for the Web of things >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> Karen Coyle >> kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net >> m: 1-510-435-8234 (Signal) >> skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600 >> > > Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org <mailto:dsr@w3.org>> > http://www.w3.org/People/Raggett > W3C Data Activity Lead & W3C champion for the Web of things > > > > > > -- Karen Coyle kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net m: 1-510-435-8234 (Signal) skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600
Received on Thursday, 3 May 2018 19:29:23 UTC