Re: [dxwg] Profile Composition and Languages

@rob-metalinkage 
> I have already created a "straw man" for a lightweight description of profiles independent of the profile specification language - potentially as part of dcat - since this is a concern for describing data sets and extends dct:conformsTo and dc:Standard just enough to declare relationships and bind to profile description resources. This is intended to support existing profile hierarchies (described in documents) as well as profile descriptions in OWL, SHACL or other choices.

I followed @dr-shorthair 's [suggestion](https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/162#issuecomment-374067581) and pasted one of your examples into the [Wiki](https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/wiki/Application-profiles) with some comments from me for further discussion

> I dont believe we are in a position to require or develop a specific profile description vocabulary - but i would expect that DCAT profile guidance would be able to recommend use of W3C vocabularies such as SHACL and RDF-Datacube

I think we can, perhaps not as a recommendation, but at least as a WG note

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by larsgsvensson
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/162#issuecomment-375413993 using your GitHub account

Received on Thursday, 22 March 2018 18:35:56 UTC