- From: Dave Raggett via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2018 16:28:04 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
If DXWG agree on the errata, it should be simple to publish them so that they are easily found by people looking at the DCAT spec. The replacement spec for DCAT would be able to obsolete RDF terms defined in the former specification. However, I am unaware of a machine interpretable means to mark RDF terms as withdrawn. This is an interesting use case for annotations for RDF. Other use cases relate to temporal, spatial, provenance, trust and data quality annotations. e.g. when a relation old holds since a given date. There is a potential connection to Property Graphs. I am at an early stage of planning for a W3C workshop on taking stock after two decades of RDF and linked data. -- GitHub Notification of comment by draggett Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/pull/169#issuecomment-375005879 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 21 March 2018 16:28:07 UTC