Re: [dxwg] original DCAT had foaf:Page where it looks like foaf:page was intended.

@draggett Publishing this erratum should not take much effort and certainly be possible before the new DCAT becomes a Recommendation. Or are there efforts necessary I am not aware of?

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by akuckartz
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/pull/169#issuecomment-374929813 using your GitHub account

Received on Wednesday, 21 March 2018 13:06:45 UTC