Re: [dxwg] original DCAT had foaf:Page where it looks like foaf:page was intended.

However, I wonder if an erratum should be issued for the old DCAT? 
@draggett @kcoyle @pwin what do you think? 

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by dr-shorthair
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/pull/169#issuecomment-374772656 using your GitHub account

Received on Tuesday, 20 March 2018 22:04:17 UTC