- From: Dan Brickley via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2018 22:41:28 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
> so, under the open-world assumption db:DataSet may just be metadata +1, the question of whether the data is actually there (especially in RDF) is another matter to what the definitions say. I can imagine that there are things that are considered (dcat) datasets, but not (qb) datasets, because they're not usefully modeled as data cubes. Maybe a domain-specific file format, or e.g. a trained machine learning model (like a parameter set for https://research.googleblog.com/2016/09/show-and-tell-image-captioning-open.html ), ... could be considered non-cube datasets. FWIW Schema.org's Dataset type is slightly more inclusive than DCAT's in that it de-emphasises any requirement to be managed/curated/published in a catalog or portal. -- GitHub Notification of comment by danbri Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/88#issuecomment-372486724 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 12 March 2018 22:41:37 UTC