- From: Simon Cox via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2018 01:13:34 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
This is a separate issue to prepare the alignment. #65 concerns guidance on use of DCAT in weakly axiomatized environment, which probably has a dependency on the alignment/mapping, but is a distinct concern. **Relevant commentary copied over from #65** @andrea-perego commented on 20 Jan • Some work has been carried out in the framework of SDW that can turn to be relevant here: https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/ISO_19115_-_DCAT_-_Schema.org_mapping The specified mappings were based on existing work, including a mapping of DCAT-AP, GeoDCAT-AP, and StatDCAT-AP to Schema.org: https://github.com/ec-jrc/dcat-ap-to-schema-org/blob/master/documentation/Background.md @makxdekkers commented on 7 Feb This would be very useful for tools that could create the relevant schema.org markup for a landing page for the dataset based on the DCAT description. @andrea-perego commented on 8 Feb • This would be very useful for tools that could create the relevant schema.org markup for a landing page for the dataset based on the DCAT description. The DCAT-AP to Schema.org mapping exercise I mentioned earlier in this thread includes also SPARQL queries implementing such mappings: https://github.com/ec-jrc/dcat-ap-to-schema-org/tree/master/sparql @dr-shorthair commented on 1 Mar I propose adding an RDF alignment document for DCAT-schema.org to enable this discussion @dr-shorthair commented on 7 Mar More mappings from SDWWG and Project Open Data added in #146 @dr-shorthair commented on 23 Mar Preliminary DCAT-schema.org alignment here: https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/blob/gh-pages/dcat/rdf/schema.ttl -- GitHub Notification of comment by dr-shorthair Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/251#issuecomment-395261560 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 7 June 2018 01:13:35 UTC