Re: [dxwg] profileDesc and the Guidance document

I do have a question (or suggestion)  about the metadata side of things...

a lot of this is standard "cataloguing" - and would be covered by the DCAT move to an abstract dcat:Resource

so wondering if we shouldnt push this into a more general statement about using available descriptive metadata
the bits that are not already covered by DCAT are of course
"  * Relationship to vocabs or other profiles
  * Link to validation schemas implementing the profile "

This tends to support the alignment of profileDesc with DCAT - which could be pointed as a recommended way to use DCAT to meet these goals.


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by rob-metalinkage
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/242#issuecomment-409066804 using your GitHub account

Received on Tuesday, 31 July 2018 01:47:14 UTC