- From: David Browning via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 15:22:29 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
I quite like the idea of a Git transaction but not all new versions would naturally be picked up that way, I think. For those that do, then perhaps we should encourage it An example where the textual approach works better would be where a publisher has changed coverage in some way, but the rest stays the same. [This is fairly common practice with financial data - I may have a dataset that claims to cover corporates across the EU for example but has systematic issues for the UK (for example). When I address those issues, I may want to treat it as a new version of the original dataset rather than a new dataset as a way of signalling to users that its an important change but still an evolution of what I produced before] This is all information domain specific, of course. -- GitHub Notification of comment by davebrowning Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/89#issuecomment-368914163 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 27 February 2018 15:22:31 UTC