- From: Stijn Goedertier via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 22:49:59 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
I also agree with Makx' proposal to drop domain axioms as much as possible. There are currently 12 non-deprecated properties in [DCAT](https://www.w3.org/ns/dcat#) with a domain restriction (see below). Dropping the domain restrictions will make these properties more broadly reusable; although it may be difficult to think of specific use cases for them in advance. Regarding the implications in terms of reasoning, dropping domain axioms would no longer make it possible to [infer class membership](https://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-primer/#Domain_and_Range_Restrictions) from the use of the property. I think most users of dcat would expect this to be stated explicitly in the metadata. ``` dcat:dataset rdfs:domain dcat:Catalog. dcat:record rdfs:domain dcat:Catalog. dcat:themeTaxonomy rdfs:domain dcat:Catalog. dcat:contactPoint rdfs:domain dcat:Dataset. #see also #95 dcat:distribution rdfs:domain dcat:Dataset. dcat:keyword rdfs:domain dcat:Dataset. dcat:landingPage rdfs:domain dcat:Dataset. dcat:theme rdfs:domain dcat:Dataset. dcat:accessURL rdfs:domain dcat:Distribution. dcat:byteSize rdfs:domain dcat:Distribution. dcat:downloadURL rdfs:domain dcat:Distribution. dcat:mediaType rdfs:domain dcat:Distribution. ``` -- GitHub Notification of comment by stijngoedertier Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/110#issuecomment-365771303 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 14 February 2018 22:50:01 UTC