- From: Rob Atkinson via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 23:57:12 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
The issue is that is legal to use of a skos:Concept where a range is rdfs:Class, and this then is an explicit case of OWL punning. (I believe this is "intended"). Whether there is another unstated contract that OWL-Full semantics may not be used as intended is a separate matter - i.e. is there a Use Case from which we may derive a requirement that OWL-DL semantics MUST be supported by use of DCAT? I'm not stating that this unreasonable, just that we dont have evidence to force us to make such a constraint at this stage. I also wonder whether this is a case where the best approach could be an explicit OWL-DL profile of DCAT, where OWL-DL reasoning can be assumed? I also think validation or identification of OWL profile is probably an necessary infrastructure demand if we want to enforce anything - its not IMHO reasonable to make all stakeholders expert in these matters. -- GitHub Notification of comment by rob-metalinkage Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/314#issuecomment-416406316 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 27 August 2018 23:57:13 UTC