- From: Rob Atkinson via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2018 08:22:04 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
No.. the requirement is that negotiation by Crs is orthogonal and can coexist with negotiation by profile... On Fri, 3 Aug 2018, 17:46 Dimitri van Hees <notifications@github.com> wrote: > Is it already decided that CRS negitiation should be done using profiles? > Personally, I think the idea of profiles is way too flexible and thus > complex for the average usecase where I just want to indicate my preferred > CRS. IMHO, CRS is comparible with 'language'. > > — > You are receiving this because you authored the thread. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/311#issuecomment-410173877>, or mute > the thread > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AIR3Yes_j3za1zfXz8JDkXZBEp5iAgAqks5uM__ugaJpZM4Vrl2M> > . > -- GitHub Notification of comment by rob-metalinkage Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/311#issuecomment-410182179 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 3 August 2018 08:22:13 UTC