W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > April 2018

Re: [dxwg] Temporal coverage [RTC]

From: Stijn Goedertier via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 10:40:21 +0000
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-382689969-1524134420-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
As suggested in the use case [Modeling temporal coverage [ID27]](https://www.w3.org/TR/dcat-ucr/#ID27), [owl:time](https://www.w3.org/TR/owl-time/) can be used. Would the below example be a correct representation of a coverage for the year 2016 and 2018?

```
@prefix time: <http://www.w3.org/2006/time#>.
@prefix dcterms: <http://purl.org/dc/terms/>.
@prefix dcat: <http://www.w3.org/ns/dcat#>.
[] 	a dcat:Dataset;
	dcterms:temporal [
		a dcterms:PeriodOfTime ;
		time:hasTime [
			a time:TemporalEntity ; 
			time:hasBeginning [ time:inXSDDate "2018-01-01"];
			time:hasEnd [ time:inXSDDate "2018-12-31"]
		] ; 
		time:hasTime [
			a time:TemporalEntity ; 
			time:hasBeginning [ time:inXSDDate "2016-01-01"];
			time:hasEnd [ time:inXSDDate "2016-12-31"]
		] 
	].
```

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by stijngoedertier
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/85#issuecomment-382689969 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 19 April 2018 10:40:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 25 March 2019 10:33:22 UTC