- From: Nicholas Car via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 13:11:25 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
In Australia we have several initiatives of government that apply rules to items in catalogues that would be best described as ODRL policies, not licenses, which motivates the use of odrl:hasPolicy.
One current example is a catalogue that is storing data generated within a project but which is only released publicly after some time. So the Use Case is:
"I am a catalogue manager and I want to encode notes on data publication permissions being enabled 6 months after dataset creation. I want to use the primary catalogue model (DCAT) rather than auxillory recording system"
This could be recorded something like this:
```
:Dataset_X
dct:license <http://linked.data.gov.au/license/CC-BY-4.0> ;
odrl:hasPolicy [
a odrl:Policy ;
rdfs:label "Access to data granted 6 months after lodgement" ;
odrl:permission [
odrl:action [
...define the publishing action...
] ;
odrl:constraint [
odrl:leftOperand xsd:dateTime ;
odrl:operator "gt" ;
odrl:rightOperand :Dataset_X_created_date + :6_months
]
]
]
```
Note that this is example is close to an ODRL Best Practice case <http://w3c.github.io/poe/bp/>, Example 1.2B
--
GitHub Notification of comment by nicholascar
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/114#issuecomment-382381052 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 18 April 2018 13:11:29 UTC