W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > November 2017

Re: Editorial changes to requirements TOC / Ask for comments

From: Alejandra Gonzalez-Beltran <alejandra.gonzalezbeltran@oerc.ox.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 20:45:55 +0000
To: Rob Atkinson <rob@metalinkage.com.au>, kcoyle@kcoyle.net
Cc: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <e0d83325-ee0c-d4d8-00dc-3a4585db4f86@oerc.ox.ac.uk>
I really like the new organisation - it makes much easier to scan the 
table of contents on the left.

A few other comments below.

In terms of the grouping, I think it would make sense to have a separate 
group "Identification" including the three first requirements currently 
under "Federation and citation". I am unsure if "Federation" covers the 
other ones in that category, but maybe "Citation" could be a separate 
group (even if related to Identification too).

The requirements on Data Access 
(https://rawgit.com/jpullmann/dxwg/gh-pages/ucr/index.html#RID19) are 
referring only to access restrictions, so it seems to me that we are 
missing a requirement on the access description in general, in addition 
to those restrictions that may exist?

Looking at the referenced use case 
(https://rawgit.com/jpullmann/dxwg/gh-pages/ucr/index.html#ID17), it 
does refer to access restrictions but I remember including there a link 
to the description of dataset access within the bioCADDIE project 
(https://rawgit.com/jpullmann/dxwg/gh-pages/ucr/index.html#ID17). There 
is another use case on distributions 
(https://rawgit.com/jpullmann/dxwg/gh-pages/ucr/index.html#ID34) that 
refers to other types of access.

Also, I think it might be useful to list the contributors at the top of 
the document (currently the document only lists use cases contributors 
in each use case).

Thanks,

Alejandra


On 29/11/2017 19:52, Rob Atkinson wrote:
> +1
>
>
> On Thu, 30 Nov 2017 at 04:34 Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net 
> <mailto:kcoyle@kcoyle.net>> wrote:
>
>     Jaro - I think this looks good. All requirements are in a group
>     undering
>     a heading. We could probably discuss the placement of some of the
>     requirements (I didn't look at it closely for that aspect) but the
>     important thing is that it is now fairly easy to scan the list of
>     requirements.
>
>     Thanks for doing this.
>     kc
>
>     On 11/29/17 5:32 AM, Jaroslav Pullmann wrote:
>     >
>     >  Dear colleagues,
>     >
>     >   please have a look at the updated requirements TOC here:
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     https://rawgit.com/jpullmann/dxwg/gh-pages/ucr/index.html#Requirements
>     >
>     >   compared to:
>     >
>     > https://rawgit.com/w3c/dxwg/gh-pages/ucr/index.html#Requirements
>     >
>     >   I re-arranged few of the requirements to make the groups more
>     consistent.
>     >  Further I shortened some labels in a nominal style and added
>     persistent
>     > IDs
>     >  for requirements (at moment only visually) to make them
>     independent of
>     > ordering.
>     >
>     >   Let me know whether this is acceptable, I'd then apply the
>     changes to
>     > DXWG UCR document.
>     >  I'll try to process any feedback received till the handover on
>     Monday,
>     > 4th.
>     >
>     >   Many thanks
>     >  Jaro
>     >
>     >
>     >
>
>     --
>     Karen Coyle
>     kcoyle@kcoyle.net <mailto:kcoyle@kcoyle.net> http://kcoyle.net
>     m: 1-510-435-8234 (Signal)
>     skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600 <tel:+1%20510-984-3600>
>
Received on Wednesday, 29 November 2017 20:46:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 April 2019 13:44:56 UTC