W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > November 2017

Re: dxwg-ACTION-59: Write up a general case for requirements 6.27 and 6.28

From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 09:01:50 -0800
To: andrea.perego@ec.europa.eu, public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <9e671694-f34a-8dd6-70f3-5587903a3141@kcoyle.net>
My recollection, Andrea, is that most of the group did not understand in
any level of detail what the Use Case was requiring of DCAT. I suspect
that if the requirement is to require that DCAT include both unqualified
and qualified terms, that many will consider that out of scope. At the
least we would need a list of terms that need an additional, qualified
form. There could, however, be guidance regarding the need for qualified
terms and suggesting preferred solutions. Honestly, we didn't discuss it
in any depth because I don't believe that the use case was generally
understood.

I would suggest marking these two requirements as currently undecided in
the FPWD, and we can set aside a time in the near future to clarify this
with the group and decide what to do with them.

If anyone remembers it differently, please let us know.

kc

On 11/28/17 4:31 AM, andrea.perego@ec.europa.eu wrote:
> This action was about the creation of a general use case for these two requirements (now 6.8.4 [1] & 6.8.5 [2]), concerning the use of "qualified forms" for specifying relationships between a dataset and related resources.
> 
> The reference UC (5.19 [3]) is however already generic, so I wonder whether there's a specific aspect that needs to be addressed here. 
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Andrea
> 
> ----
> [1] https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/ucr/#RID19.1 
> [2] https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/ucr/#RID19.2 
> [3] https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/ucr/#ID19 
> 
> ----
> Andrea Perego, Ph.D.
> Scientific / Technical Project Officer
> European Commission DG JRC
> Directorate B - Growth and Innovation
> Unit B6 - Digital Economy
> Via E. Fermi, 2749 - TP 262
> 21027 Ispra VA, Italy
> 
> https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/
> 
> ----
> The views expressed are purely those of the writer and may
> not in any circumstances be regarded as stating an official
> position of the European Commission.
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Dataset Exchange Working Group Issue Tracker
>> [mailto:sysbot+tracker@w3.org]
>> Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2017 10:43 PM
>> To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
>> Subject: dxwg-ACTION-59: Write up a general case for requirements 6.27 and
>> 6.28
>>
>> dxwg-ACTION-59: Write up a general case for requirements 6.27 and 6.28
>>
>> https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/59
>>
>> Assigned to: Andrea Perego
> 

-- 
Karen Coyle
kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net
m: 1-510-435-8234 (Signal)
skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600
Received on Tuesday, 28 November 2017 17:02:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 25 March 2019 10:33:20 UTC