- From: Svensson, Lars <L.Svensson@dnb.de>
- Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 07:30:00 +0000
- To: Rob Atkinson <rob@metalinkage.com.au>, Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- CC: "public-dxwg-wg@w3.org" <public-dxwg-wg@w3.org>
On Wednesday, June 14, 2017 11:13 PM, Rob Atkinson [mailto:rob@metalinkage.com.au] wrote: > Great input. Thanks Karen! Yes, absolutely! > Its important we separate profiles _of_ DCAT and support for describing profiles of > dataset specifications a dataset may conform to. > > Supporting multiple expressions of a given profile in DCAT may help users get familiar > with the usage and discovery of profiles of DCAT. Certainly the uptake issue needs > thought. +1 to all of the above (which I think includes support for Karen's statement that "we need a hook between the vocabulary profile and the documentation/validation aspects". If it doesn't, +1 to that, too, assuming that a "vocabulary profile" is the same as a "profile" defined as "additional semantic or syntactic constraints"). Best, Lars
Received on Monday, 19 June 2017 07:30:36 UTC