- From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2017 06:15:09 -0700
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Yes, thanks. This one works great. - kc On 7/3/17 1:39 AM, Jaroslav Pullmann wrote: > > Hello Karen, > > thanks for the hint, I have uploaded a higher-resolution preview here: > https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BwQz5mWMUijvU3BsZlBIc2t5MFU/ > > Best regards > Jaroslav > > On 02.07.2017 17:36, Karen Coyle wrote: >> Hi, Jaroslav. It may just be my screen, but the map isn't readable for >> me - when I increase the size it is "fuzzy". Can you send a version that >> is in a higher resolution? >> >> Thanks, >> kc >> >> On 6/30/17 5:35 AM, Jaroslav Pullmann wrote: >>> >>> Dear WG members, >>> >>> in order to visualize the relations among the use cases and to easier >>> identify possible gaps that still might exist I created a simple >>> mind map: >>> >>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BwQz5mWMUijvR0JYa2owQXZNTjA >>> >>> The nodes roughly correspond to existing / foreseen use cases, >>> most edges are labeled by the type of relationship or the aspect a >>> UC contributes to another. The map might further provide hints on how >>> to cluster the UCs in order to extract common sets of requirements.. >>> >>> Best regards >>> Jaroslav >>> >>> >> > -- Karen Coyle kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net m: 1-510-435-8234 (Signal) skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600
Received on Monday, 3 July 2017 13:15:39 UTC