W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > December 2017

Re: Conneg definition was: Re: Start of profiles analysis page - 2nd reply

From: Rob Atkinson <rob@metalinkage.com.au>
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 20:22:59 +0000
Message-ID: <CACfF9LzT7BHOrr+yh-XoEuaKuJrgtvcH_9o_BF6bM-aN7imLOg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ruben Verborgh <Ruben.Verborgh@ugent.be>
Cc: "Svensson, Lars" <L.Svensson@dnb.de>, "mail@makxdekkers.com" <mail@makxdekkers.com>, "public-dxwg-wg@w3.org" <public-dxwg-wg@w3.org>
+1

On Mon, 11 Dec 2017 at 00:54 Ruben Verborgh <Ruben.Verborgh@ugent.be> wrote:

> >> 2. A data profile that the data in the file described using DCAT
> conforms to, to allow
> >> software that wants to fetch the data to get a particular view of the
> data
> >
> > I'd say that technically (for the purpose of describing and negotiating
> profiles) those two are the same: It's about describing the structure and
> constraints of data and in that respect, a DCAT description is only a piece
> of data. So no, in my view we only have one type of profile.
>
> +1, also see this discussion:
> https://github.com/ProfileNegotiation/I-D-Accept--Schema/issues/21
>
> Most important part of the story for me:
> for conneg purposes, all of those things are simply profiles.
> We should not distinguish at the level of conneg
> (but might do so at other levels).
>
> Ruben
>
Received on Monday, 11 December 2017 20:23:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 April 2019 13:44:56 UTC