W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > December 2017

Conneg definition was: Re: Start of profiles analysis page - 2nd reply

From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2017 02:37:45 -0800
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <15e46dd6-31b0-cfb2-32b0-a92aa5d0d004@kcoyle.net>
Annette, thanks for the reality check. And as Ruben says, the main aim
is to access data that matches one or more application profiles.

On 12/8/17 1:24 AM, Ruben Verborgh wrote:
> Hi Annette,
>> In my mind, the conneg bit that's needed is about adding the ability to negotiate not the profile itself but the distribution (of a dataset) that supports a preferred profile.

The only requirement seems to be:

6.8.3 Profile negotiation
Create a way to negotiate choice of profile between clients and servers

Perhaps that needs to be more specific so that it is clearly about
choosing data that is consistent with a given application profile.


> The second is our main aim,
> but conneg clearly also makes sense for the profile itself
> if that is available in multiple representations.
>> Content negotiation already has the capability to handle the case of requesting a copy of astrodcat itself as astrodcat.rdf vs astrodcat.xml vs astrodcat.json.
> Indeed, it's this mechanism I propose to reuse
> (but no need to mandate that).
> Ruben

Karen Coyle
kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net
m: 1-510-435-8234 (Signal)
skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600
Received on Friday, 8 December 2017 10:38:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 April 2019 13:44:56 UTC