Re: Analysis of DCAT profiles

+1 for including at least some examples of subsidary profiles.   If there
are many, then recording what aspects are being profiled and a count might
be more useful than detailing each profile separately.

Rob

On Tue, 29 Aug 2017 at 23:03 Svensson, Lars <L.Svensson@dnb.de> wrote:

> Dear Alejandra,
>
> On Monday, August 07, 2017 3:45 PM, Alejandra Gonzalez-Beltran [mailto:
> alejandra.gonzalezbeltran@oerc.ox.ac.uk] wrote:
>
> > As starting point for the action assigned to me on an analysis of DCAT
> > profiles (https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/32), I started the
> > following spreadsheet:
> >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/12t6a9seTmCi47p6k8HH1Mz4k2CedhZSZ9sbU
> > paRrQO8/edit?usp=sharing
> >
> > where I am compiling information about the profiles (links to
> > documentation, editors, validation tools, SHACL/ShEx representations)
> > and the classes and properties they specify.
> >
> > Please, feel free to include comments on the spreadsheet for
> > additions/corrections, etc.
> >
> > I started with DCAT-AP, but will continue with GeoDCAT-AP and
> StatDCAT-AP.
> >
> > Are there other profiles to be considered?
>
> Does it make sense to consider national DCAT-APs, too? In June this year,
> the German GovData initiative published DCAT-AP.de [1]. The main difference
> is that DCAT-AP.de makes the license statement on Distributions mandatory,
> makes some changes on what's recommended and what's optional, and adds some
> further constraints and some new properties compared to DCAT-AP. I could
> help add that to the spreadsheet.
>
> DCAT-AP.de could also serve as an example of a cascading profile adding
> further constraints and semantics to DCAT-AP.
>
> [1] http://www.dcat-ap.de/def/dcatde/1_0/spec/specification.pdf (only
> available in German, I'm afraid...)
>
> Best,
>
> Lars
>
>