Re: DXWG Conneg by Profile Issues 662 & 663

Thanks, Nick. I’m happy with your resolution. The draft looks quite interesting, but ultimately a best-practices “cook book” might be useful for developers, rather than requiring them to navigate the different options you lay out.

Gregg Kellogg
gregg@greggkellogg.net

> On Apr 29, 2019, at 12:33 AM, Car, Nicholas (L&W, Dutton Park) <Nicholas.Car@csiro.au> wrote:
> 
> Hi Gregg,
>  
> Two of the Issues you raised for the DXWG conneg work are:
>  
> https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/662 <https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/662> - Differentiate profile parameter and Accept-Profile header
> https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/663 <https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/663> - Justify the use of opaque URIs for profiles
>  
> I’ve just closed them both now since we’ve addressed them. Are you happy with the results? I did see you’d thumbs up’d one of them already!
>  
> We’ll be releasing the Second Public Working Draft of Conneg by Profile this week and it’s actually already accessible athttps://www.w3.org/TR/2019/WD-dx-prof-conneg-20190430/ <https://www.w3.org/TR/2019/WD-dx-prof-conneg-20190430/>. Are the issues you originally raised now better addressed by this draft? Do you see any other issues?
>  
> Thanks,
>  
> Nick
>  
> Nicholas Car
> Senior Experimental Scientist
> CSIRO Land & Water
> 41 Boggo Road, Dutton Park, QLD 4102, Australia
> E nicholas.car@csiro.au <mailto:nicholas.car@csiro.au> M 0477 560 177 P 07 3833 5632