Re: Fwd: Feedback for https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/dcat/

Hi Simon,

1.       There is no requirement that any particular end-point (URL) may
> only provide one service type. Sub-classes of a common parent are not
> disjoint unless said so. The RDF open-world-assumption says that anything
> that isn't explicitly stated is undefined, so modelling is generally
> permissive rather than exclusive.
>

Ok, thank you for that confirmation.

2.       Catalog and CatalogRecord have not been changed compared with DCAT
> 2014, except that we now recognise that a Catalog is a kind of Dataset,
> composed of Dataset and DataService descriptions.


Ok, yes, that's the part that I am particularly interested in: considering
it as a type of Dataset, and understanding the history behind the overlap
of members between it and Resource.

3.       The topic of Related Datasets (and relationships between
> catalogued resources in general) is the topic of
> https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/81 which has not yet been resolved.
>

Thank you, I will take a look.

Melanie