W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dwbp-wg@w3.org > November 2016

Re: Implementation Report

From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 15:54:44 +0000
To: public-dwbp-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <e2360f18-cd0a-bbd4-f556-987812d71152@w3.org>
I've just added MusicBrainz to the spreadsheet. It's pretty good in that 
it passes a lot of the BPs but there's no machine readable metadata. But 
then that's not what they're trying to do so it's not a bad thing in 
that sense.

There's a Linked Data version but the documentation for it shows that 
it's rather old and out of date so I don't think it would help to add 
that to the implementation report.


On 24/11/2016 14:32, Caroline Burle wrote:
> Dear all,
> we elaborated the first draft Implementation Report [1], as we agreed on
> our last meeting, explaining the Methodology we used to collect evidence
> as well as listing the organizations from which we collected them.
> We kindly ask you to take a look if possible before our call tomorrow
> and if you have any suggestions, please let us know as soon as you can.
> We’re still improving the implementation report, adjusting table, fixing
> javascript and css bugs. However, you may already check the structure
> and most important, the methodology.
> Thank you! Kind regards,
> BP Editors
> [1] http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/dwbp-implementation-report.html


Phil Archer
Data Strategist, W3C

+44 (0)7887 767755
Received on Thursday, 24 November 2016 15:54:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 24 November 2016 15:54:57 UTC