W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dwbp-wg@w3.org > November 2016

Re: Inconsistent naming of DUV

From: Eric Stephan <ericphb@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 05:44:41 -0800
Message-ID: <CAMFz4jiuzoNgYzfjU9Kn-4_xokw-Q3sOSQq4cgYE=G_2JAmePw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Riccardo Albertoni <albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it>
Cc: Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br>, "Purohit, Sumit" <Sumit.Purohit@pnnl.gov>, DWBP Public List <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>, Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
Thank you Riccardo, I missed this message,  I'll respond back to the
original note from Andrea.

Eric S

On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 9:11 AM, Riccardo Albertoni <
albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it> wrote:

>
> Hi all,
>
> Have we decided anything about Andrea's suggestion? (see the mail attached)
>
> I am in favor of his proposal, namely to  use "data usage vocabulary"
> instead of   "dataset usage", but I guess  the DUV editors have the last
> word here:) .
>
> Cheers,
> Riccardo
>
> PS. No matter what we will decide on  DUV, I wouldn't change the D in the
> DQV,  keeping it as Data Quality Vocabulary.
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Andrea Perego <andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu>
> Date: 12 October 2016 at 12:24
> Subject: Inconsistent naming of DUV
> To: W3C DWBP WG - Comments <public-dwbp-comments@w3.org>
>
>
> Dear DWBP WG,
>
> I don't know if this issue has already been reported or discussed, but I
> noticed that DUV is referred to inconsistently in both the DUV and the DQV
> specifications (actually, I haven't checked the other DWBP specifications).
>
> More precisely, although the "official" name of DUV is "dataset usage
> Vocabulary", sometimes it is cited as "data usage vocabulary".
>
> I take this opportunity also to raise a question on the choice behind the
> official name of DUV - i.e., whether there's a reason for using "dataset
> usage" instead of "data usage". Personally, I think that it may be
> misleading, also because DQV = "*data* quality vocabulary". As far as I can
> see, their scope is not different - they're both about *data*. So why call
> them differently?
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> Andrea
>
> --
> Andrea Perego, Ph.D.
> Scientific / Technical Project Officer
> European Commission DG JRC
> Directorate B - Growth and Innovation
> Unit B6 - Digital Economy
> Via E. Fermi, 2749 - TP 262
> 21027 Ispra VA, Italy
>
> https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/
>
> ----
> The views expressed are purely those of the writer and may
> not in any circumstances be regarded as stating an official
> position of the European Commission.
>
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned by E.F.A. Project and is believed to be
> clean.
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------------
> Riccardo Albertoni
> Istituto per la Matematica Applicata e Tecnologie Informatiche "Enrico
> Magenes"
> Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche
> via de Marini 6 - 16149 GENOVA - ITALIA
> tel. +39-010-6475624 - fax +39-010-6475660
> e-mail: Riccardo.Albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it
> Skype: callto://riccardoalbertoni/
> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/riccardoalbertoni
> www: *http://www.imati.cnr.it/ <http://www.imati.cnr.it/>*
> http://purl.oclc.org/NET/riccardoAlbertoni
> FOAF:http://purl.oclc.org/NET/RiccardoAlbertoni/foaf
>
Received on Tuesday, 15 November 2016 13:45:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 15 November 2016 13:45:52 UTC