Re: Three ordinary WDs for publication 2015-05-19

Thanks Denis,

point noted re PubRules.

Patent policy link on vocab-duv duly updated.

Cheers

Phil.

On 18/05/2016 11:31, Denis Ah-Kang wrote:
> Hi Phil,
>
>
>
> On 05/18/2016 01:20 PM, Phil Archer wrote:
>> Data on the Web Best Practices
>> ==============================
>> URL:
>> https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-dwbp-20160519/
>>
>> Resolution to publish:
>> https://www.w3.org/2016/05/13-dwbp-minutes#resolution02
>
> That document is ready to be published tomorrow.
>
>>
>> Dataset Usage Vocabulary
>> ========================
>>
>> URL: https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-vocab-duv-20160519/
>>
>> Resolution to publish:
>> https://www.w3.org/2016/05/13-dwbp-minutes#resolution04
>>
>> This is not a Rec Track document - the next version is likely to be the
>> last and will be published as a Note. This is reflected in the SoTD
>> section which PubRules seems to complain about but the text is correct I
>> believe (it's from ReSpec).
>>
>
> In pubrules, you have to select the option "Not expected to become a
> Recommendation" if the document is expected to become a Note.
>
> The link to to the patent policy should be
> http://www.w3.org/2004/01/pp-impl/68239/status
> instead of
> http://www.w3.org/2004/01/pp-impl/68238/status
>
> Can you please fix that?
>
>>
>> Data Quality Vocabulary
>> =======================
>>
>> URL: https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-vocab-dqv-20160519/
>>
>> Resolution to publish:
>> https://www.w3.org/2016/05/13-dwbp-minutes#resolution03
>>
>> Same issues as above with the non-rec Track status section.
>>
>
> Ready to be published.
>
> Denis
>

-- 


Phil Archer
W3C Data Activity Lead
http://www.w3.org/2013/data/

http://philarcher.org
+44 (0)7887 767755
@philarcher1

Received on Wednesday, 18 May 2016 11:39:44 UTC