- From: Debattista, Jeremy <Jeremy.Debattista@iais.fraunhofer.de>
- Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 07:59:02 +0000
- To: Riccardo Albertoni <albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it>
- CC: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>, DWBP Public List <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>, Dimitris Kontokostas <kontokostas@informatik.uni-leipzig.de>
Hi Riccardo, > Said that, your comment reveals that this design choice can be misunderstood, Do you think we should add a note or a sentence to make our point clearer? Yes I think a note would make this clearer :) > Collecting the DQV implementations is a good idea, but I am not sure we should list them in the DQV Document. Very soon, we are supposed to have the final DQV vote, and after the last vote, we are not allowed to update the document anymore. > Then the risk is to leave out many of the implementations that are still in progress. > > What do you think about having the implementations collected in a the w3c DWBP wiki page? A wiki page can be easily maintained after the vote and I guess we are allowed to refer to such a page from the DQV document. Perfect, we can start with the wiki page and maybe make a link in the DQV page pointing to it. Cheers, Jer
Received on Tuesday, 14 June 2016 07:59:36 UTC