RE: DWBP Evidences Form

Newton,

Thanks.

Comment on the Organization info:
What is the role of the 'name' and 'email' on the form? Should that be for a person affiliated to the organisation mentioned, or should it be the person who submits the evidence? In my case, I am not affiliated to the organisation for which I submit the reference.

(Note that I entered a fake organisation record so that I could see the individual evidences)

On the Best Practice evidence block: 
In my case, 'evidence' will be a reference to a guideline. In that case 'pass' will be that there is compatible advice in the guidelines; should I mention that in the comments?
I might not be able in all cases to provide a resolvable URI for the evidence. E.g. one set of guidelines that I'll be linking to is only available in PDF through a landing page. In that case, I can refer in the comments to a section or page number in the document where the 'evidence' can be found.

Makx.




-----Original Message-----
From: Newton Calegari [mailto:newton@nic.br] 
Sent: 08 July 2016 05:03
To: Public DWBP WG <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
Subject: DWBP Evidences Form

Hi all,

I have uploaded the DWBP Evidences Form to the server and it's available at [1].

I kindly ask you all to test and validate it, and if you have any feedback, feel free to suggest any improvement here by email or on the next call.

The idea to fill the form is the following:

     first provide information about the organization which is implementing the BPs;
     after this information is provided, a list of all BPs is shown and the user answers only those BPs that are been implemented;
     it's possible to duplicate the same BP in order to provide more than once evidence for each BP;

cheers,

Newton

1: http://w3c.br/form-dwbp/

Received on Thursday, 14 July 2016 08:21:22 UTC