Re: comments on the DUV

Phil,

I like your idea, I'll put these changes in place.

Eric

On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 6:11 AM, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org> wrote:

>
>
> On 15/01/2016 13:22, Eric Stephan wrote:
> [..]
>
>
>>> — Concerning the current diagram
>>> ----------------------------------------------
>>> Rdfs:literal appears three times in the diagram.
>>> Skos:Concept also appears three times
>>> oa:Annotation appears two times.
>>> foaf:Agent appears twice.
>>>
>>>
>>> Eric feedback:  Joao Paulo, we can try a diagram with only one class
>> mentioned, do you think this is a showstopper for getting comments from
>> others or can this wait until the next review?
>>
>>
>>
> My instinct is to agree, Joao Paulo, however, in this instance I'm not
> sure I do. That's because the vocabulary has three distinct parts
> (citation, feedback and usage) so I wouldn't necessarily expect to see just
> one skos:Concept in the diagram. That said, the attached png shows an idea
> for how to reduce the number of boxes in the usage area.
>
> Phil
>