- From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 20:10:43 +0000
- To: Eric Stephan <ericphb@gmail.com>, Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br>, "Purohit, Sumit" <Sumit.Purohit@pnnl.gov>
- Cc: Public DWBP WG <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
Eric, Sumit, Berna, I have an idea this won't be the only question I have for you about DUV but I'm working through it and I'll jot down some observations and questions as I go. First of all, I've fixed the ReSpec errors so my copy is now OK on that score [1]. Secondly, in the Status section, the text says "This is a draft document which may be merged into another document or eventually make its way into being a standalone Working Draft." is that still true? I may be wrong but my impression is that the WG finds it easier to keep DUV and DQV separate. The Status section needs to have at least one custom paragraph, i.e. some indication of what *this* version is about, it's stability etc. *If* the following is accurate, then something like: "This is the second iteration of the vocabulary, developed following extensive consultation among and outside the working group who now regard it as nearing completion. Comment and feedback is sought before the next iteration which is likely to be the final version for the foreseeable future." would be appropriate. I'm hoping to add links to your SVG next... Phil [1] http://philarcher1.github.io/dwbp/vocab-du.html -- Phil Archer W3C Data Activity Lead http://www.w3.org/2013/data/ http://philarcher.org +44 (0)7887 767755 @philarcher1
Received on Thursday, 14 January 2016 20:10:41 UTC