- From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2016 17:31:23 +0200
- To: <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
Hi Phil, all, In the rush of big changes this week, there 's something I have overlooked: a reference to comparing datasets has been removed from the intended outcome of the BP "Reuse vocabularies, preferably standardized ones". I'm fine with keeping the intended outcome as is, but I remember Steve and some others were keen on comparability and I think it's worth keeping it somewhere. So in the "why" section of this BP I'd suggest the following replacement: "helps the automatic processing of both data and metadata" -> "helps the comparison and automatic processing of both data and metadata" If there's no objection to this, can anyone currently editing the BPs do this edit? I'm reluctant to mess around with the doc for such a small change. Thanks, Antoine On 29/04/16 18:14, Phil Archer wrote: > This has been done. > > I created a copy of the Google spreadsheet so that I could edit it [1] and then copied everything across to the main doc. In doing so I found I needed to move some of the content around in the data enrichment BP. There's nothing new there but there was a lot in the intended outcome that I think went better in the implementation section. > > @editors - there's a pull request for your consideration. > > Cheers > > Phil. > > [1] https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1tVxNkRRg-5TL8BqbDjpFqFb7D7G1e8Uzba8wv8WjEl8/edit?usp=sharing > > On 29/04/2016 14:48, Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: >> dwbp-ACTION-277: Change all the phrases of intedend outcomes to present. e.g. consumers will know that data that is referred to from the current dataset is unavailable or only available under different conditions. >> >> http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/277 >> >> Assigned to: Phil Archer >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
Received on Saturday, 30 April 2016 15:31:53 UTC