- From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 10:18:18 +0100
- To: Annette Greiner <amgreiner@lbl.gov>, Public DWBP WG <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
In my latest pull request, thanks On 28/04/2016 00:08, Annette Greiner wrote: > Yes, that's much better. Thanks! > -Annette > > On 4/27/16 10:22 AM, Phil Archer wrote: >> Let me offer a slight alternative How to test for "Use persistent URIs >> as identifiers of datasets" that I hope addresses your point. >> >> Currently it says: >> >> Check that each dataset in question is identified using a URI that has >> been assigned under a controlled process. Ideally, the relevant Web >> site includes a description of the process and a credible pledge of >> persistence should the publisher no longer be able to maintain the URI >> space themselves. >> >> New suggestion: >> >> Check that each dataset is identified using a URI that has been >> designed for persistence. Ideally the relevant Web site includes a >> description of the design scheme and a credible pledge of persistence >> should the publisher no longer be able to maintain the URI space >> themselves. >> >> Better? >> >> Phil. >> > -- Phil Archer W3C Data Activity Lead http://www.w3.org/2013/data/ http://philarcher.org +44 (0)7887 767755 @philarcher1
Received on Thursday, 28 April 2016 09:18:28 UTC