- From: Annette Greiner <amgreiner@lbl.gov>
- Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 09:50:13 -0700
- To: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Cc: public-dwbp-wg@w3.org
Personally, I like the fuller version that Antoine wrote. Is there consensus on how these should be written? I prefer seeing full sentences with actual subjects, but I know at least Phil prefers the verb phrase form. We need to be consistent. -Annette Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 27, 2016, at 6:44 AM, Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl> wrote: > > Hi Phil, > > Thanks for the feedback! > I'm more than ok with your changes (thanks for this too!) expect maybe in the intended outcome. It was: > [ > Using the same vocabulary to describe metadata will make datasets and metadata easier to be compared by humans or machines. When two datasets or metadata sets use the same vocabulary, (automatic) processing tools designed for one can be more easily applied to the other. This greatly facilitates re-use of datasets. Using codes and terms from standardized vocabularies enhances consensus among data publishers and consumers. > ] > It is now: > [ > To make it easier to compare and integrate datasets; to create the network effect. > ]. > This is more elegant but may miss the naming of specific aspects that I had been asked to add in the text. This said, I personally don't care much. > > Cheers, > > Antoine > >> On 27/04/16 13:09, Phil Archer wrote: >> I have just been through that merged BP, which I think is now clear. However, the advertising copy writer in me couldn't help wanting to make a few minor tweaks to the language. My version is at >> https://philarcher1.github.io/dwbp/bp.html#ReuseVocabularies >> >> I created a PR for it - at editors' discretion. >> >> Phil. >> >> >> >>> On 27/04/2016 11:01, Antoine Isaac wrote: >>> Hi everyone, >>> >>> The two best practices are now merged, as per the PR >>> https://github.com/w3c/dwbp/pull/365 >>> I've been rather conservative in my approach. Most of the content that >>> was in the two original BPs remain, even the examples. >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> Antoine >>> >>> On 07/04/16 15:11, Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue >>> Tracker wrote: >>>> dwbp-ISSUE-253: Use standardized terms x Reuse vocabularies [Best >>>> practices document(s)] >>>> >>>> http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/253 >>>> >>>> Raised by: Bernadette Farias Loscio >>>> On product: Best practices document(s) >>>> >>>> There was some discussion about these BP on our mailing list [1][2]. >>>> Is it necessary to rewrite these best practices? Are they confusing? >>>> or we can keep these BPs the way they are right now. >>>> >>>> [1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dwbp-wg/2016Mar/0014.html >>>> [2] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dwbp-wg/2016Apr/0007.html >
Received on Wednesday, 27 April 2016 16:50:47 UTC