- From: Caroline Burle <cburle@nic.br>
- Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 15:32:52 -0300
- To: Annette Greiner <amgreiner@lbl.gov>, public-dwbp-wg@w3.org
Dear Annette, thank you for raising that, we were just discussing about it. :) Since we didn't have any feedback from the WG participants during this week (as we agreed on last week call) and consequently didn't discuss it by email, we were going to suggest during the meeting tomorrow to include Chris Little's [1] and Renato Iannella's [2] suggestions (considering your answer to Lewis [3]) in the next Draft. If the group doesn't agree, we think we could vote the document as it is and include their suggestions only in the CR. Kind regards, BP Editors [1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dwbp-comments/2016Apr/0004.html [2] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dwbp-comments/2016Apr/0000.html [3] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dwbp-comments/2016Apr/0006.html On 14/04/16 14:35, Annette Greiner wrote: > So, when will the changes that result from this week's review get > addressed? I thought there would be some attempt at that before the > actual vote. Otherwise, I think I already know how I'm going to vote. > -Annette > > On 4/14/16 7:04 AM, yaso@nic.br wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> >> This is the agenda for our call, when we expect to vote BP Doc and DQV >> https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20160415 >> >> Inputs are welcome! >> Please if you want to include a topic, send and email so we can >> include it prior to tomorrow. >> >> cheers >> yaso >> >> >
Received on Thursday, 14 April 2016 18:33:26 UTC