Re: DUV Quick review

Phil,

Thank you. Below is my feedback.

Safe travels,

Eric S

On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 6:02 AM, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org> wrote:

> Last week I promised to have looked at the DUV before this week's
> meeting... well, I managed that on a flight this morning.
>
> Real quick because I have another flight imminently.
>
> 1. I really like it.
>
> Great!


> 2. I have a few trivial comments here and there - quicker if I make a few
> edits and then offer a pull request.
>
> Thank you.


> 3. Really appreciate the examples - but I wonder if they could be in the
> Scenarios section rather than the term by term definitions?
>
> This is a really good point. we need to convey the composite view of data
usage supporting three different requirements.  in the coming week.


> And I'd suggest moving discussion of the requirements to later in the doc,
> after the definitions. I can do this as part of my trivial edits if you
> like.
>
> The one thing I don't understand is the citation classes - I really need
> an example there to clarify how it works.
>
> Agreed.  We also need to expand the discussion about the citation
requirements.  Really important.


> Sorry for the rush - boarding now.
>
> Phil
>
>
> --
>
>
> Phil Archer
> W3C Data Activity Lead
> http://www.w3.org/2013/data/
>
> http://philarcher.org
> +44 (0)7887 767755
> @philarcher1
>
>