Re: New DQV editor's draft from Debattista, Jeremy on 2015-05-22 (public-dwbp-wg@w3.org from May 2015)

From: Debattista, Jeremy <Jeremy.Debattista@iais.fraunhofer.de>
Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 14:10:12 +0000
To: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
CC: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>, Public DWBP WG <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <64050548-E3EE-428C-ABD7-875AF48D5C7A@iais.fraunhofer.de>

Hi Phil,

On 22 May 2015, at 15:02, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org<mailto:phila@w3.org>> wrote:

On reusing DaQ: the fact that it is a project output (no matter how good that project may be) does make it a little risky.

So, just for my information, what would be non-risky?

Cheers,
Jeremy

Received on Friday, 22 May 2015 14:10:44 UTC