- From: Caroline Burle <cburle@nic.br>
- Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 11:14:37 -0300
- To: public-dwbp-wg@w3.org
+1 Regards, Caroline On 13/05/15 11:01, Debattista, Jeremy wrote: > I agree as well > > +1 > > Jeremy > On 13 May 2015, at 15:58, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On 13/05/2015 14:25, yaso@nic.br wrote: >>> Agreed, Berna >>> >>> +1 >>> >>> On 05/13/2015 10:06 AM, Eric Stephan wrote: >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> Eric S >>>> >>>> On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 6:01 AM, Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> I'd like to propose to remove the Data Vocabularies section from the DWBP >>>>> document. After reviewing the document, I believe that there is a lot of >>>>> redundancy between the BP for data vocabularies and BP for metadata. >>>>> Besides, IMO the creation of vocabularies is not in the scope of the >>>>> document. >>>>> >>>>> Instead of having a section for data vocabularies, we may refer to The >>>>> Standard Vocabularies section of the W3C Best Practices for Publishing >>>>> Linked Data. >>>>> >>>>> What do you think? >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Bernadette >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Bernadette Farias Lóscio >>>>> Centro de Informática >>>>> Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil >>>>> >>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> >> -- >> >> >> Phil Archer >> W3C Data Activity Lead >> http://www.w3.org/2013/data/ >> >> http://philarcher.org >> +44 (0)7887 767755 >> @philarcher1 >> >
Received on Wednesday, 13 May 2015 14:15:08 UTC