- From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 01 May 2015 09:21:14 +0100
- To: Makx Dekkers <mail@makxdekkers.com>, 'Public DWBP WG' <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
Thanks for this Makx, I'm aware of the work you're doing in the DCAT-AP update which is clearly relevant to this group. I imagine other members of the WG will be as interested as I am in what it comes up with. If it decides it wants to recommend that new terms to be added to DCAT, this is the WG that is chartered to do that. As you know, a lot of work is going into the quality and usage work which is where any such changes would sit. Perhaps we can have a chat about this when we're in Krems in a few weeks' time. Phil. On 30/04/2015 18:29, Makx Dekkers wrote: > Phil, > > Interesting issue. I'd like to mention that in work that is being done around the DCAT application profile for data portals in Europe (https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/node/137964/), it has been noted that in DCAT, the W3C recommendation for describing datasets, there is currently no recommended way to describe time series. > > As far as I am aware, the approach you suggest cannot be expressed in DCAT as it is now. For the Application Profile, there is a discussion on how to model time series in DCAT, and it is scheduled that a draft for public review will be issued in the middle of May. > > Makx. > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Phil Archer [mailto:phila@w3.org] >> Sent: 30 April 2015 18:28 >> To: Public DWBP WG >> Subject: Thought for URI section >> >> I'm using this as a jotter so I don't forget. >> >> I'm writing a doc and want to link to the 2014 Global Open Data Index. >> Well, the index is at http://index.okfn.org/place/ and that shows the >> 2014 results. If I want last year's I go to http://index.okfn.org/place/2013/. >> But I want to link persistently to the 2014 set *today* that happens to be the >> current one. Presumably when they do next year's index that will be at >> http://index.okfn.org/place/ and the 2014 data will be at >> http://index.okfn.org/place/2014 - but that doesn't exist yet. >> >> That's more evidence, IMO, that for any time series you always need a dated >> URI and a latest version URI. >> >> Rant over. >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> Phil Archer >> W3C Data Activity Lead >> http://www.w3.org/2013/data/ >> >> http://philarcher.org >> +44 (0)7887 767755 >> @philarcher1 > > > -- Phil Archer W3C Data Activity Lead http://www.w3.org/2013/data/ http://philarcher.org +44 (0)7887 767755 @philarcher1
Received on Friday, 1 May 2015 08:21:16 UTC